Salaries, most of which are for teachers & aides, are by far the biggest driver of costs in all schools, including Yeshiva's. Pointless to talk about cost cutting without addressing the cost of maintaining a low student/teacher ratio. A lot of people insist that it's crucial to keep the ratio low, but I don't know if any scientific studies have proven that it improves education. Here's an article that argues that we need fewer teachers in the public schools and that having fewer of them would save a lot of money without impacting education. I think the same argument can be made for yeshivas. I don't think the education level was any worse 40 years ago when there were much fewer assistant teachers.
Let's discuss but please leave out the politics mentioned in the article. Plenty of other blogs for righties & lefties to duke it out over who should be running the various branches of government.
America
Has Too Many Teachers
Public-school employees have doubled in 40
years while student enrollment has increased by only 8.5%—and academic results
have stagnated.
By ANDREW J. COULSON
President Obama said last month that America can educate its way
to prosperity if Congress sends money to states to prevent public school
layoffs and "rehire even more teachers." Mitt Romney was having none
of it, invoking "the message of Wisconsin" and arguing that the
solution to our economic woes is to cut the size of government and shift
resources to the private sector. Mr. Romney later stated that he wasn't calling
for a reduction in the teacher force—but perhaps there would be some wisdom in
doing just that.
Since 1970, the public school workforce has roughly doubled—to
6.4 million from 3.3 million—and two-thirds of those new hires are teachers or
teachers' aides. Over the same period, enrollment rose by a tepid 8.5%.
Employment has thus grown 11 times faster than enrollment. If we returned to
the student-to-staff ratio of 1970, American taxpayers would save about $210
billion annually in personnel costs.
Or would
they? Stanford economist Eric Hanushek has shown that better-educated students
contribute substantially to economic growth. If U.S. students could catch up to
the mathematics performance of their Canadian counterparts, he has found, it
would add roughly $70 trillion to the U.S. economy over the next 80 years. So
if the additional three million public-school employees we've hired have helped
students learn, the nation may be better off economically.
To find out if that's true, we can look at the "long-term
trends" of 17-year-olds on the federal National Assessment of Educational
Progress. These tests, first administered four decades ago, show stagnation in
reading and math and a decline in science. Scores for black and Hispanic
students have improved somewhat, but the scores of white students (still the
majority) are flat overall, and large demographic gaps persist. Graduation
rates have also stagnated or fallen. So a doubling in staff size and more than
a doubling in cost have done little to improve academic outcomes.
Nor can the explosive growth in public-school hiring be
attributed to federal spending on special education. According to the latest
Census Bureau data, special ed teachers make up barely 5% of the K-12 work
force.
The implication of these facts is clear: America's public
schools have warehoused three million people in jobs that do little to improve
student achievement—people who would be working productively in the private
sector if that extra $210 billion were not taxed out of the economy each year.
We have already tried President Obama's education solution over
a time period and on a scale that he could not hope to replicate today. And it
has proven an expensive and tragic failure.
To avoid Greece's fate we must create new, productive
private-sector jobs to replace our unproductive government ones. Even as a
tiny, mostly nonprofit niche, American private education is substantially more
efficient than its public sector, producing higher graduation rates and similar
or better student achievement at roughly a third lower cost than public schools
(even after controlling for differences in student and family characteristics).
Associated
Press
St. Joseph's Catholic School in Kennewick, Wash.
By
making it easier for families to access independent schools, we can do what the
president's policies cannot: drive prosperity through educational improvement.
More than 20 private-school choice programs already exist around the nation.
Last month, New Hampshire legislators voted to override their governor's veto
and enact tax credits for businesses that donate to K-12 scholarship
organizations. Mr. Romney has supported such state programs. President Obama
opposes them.
While America may have too many teachers, the greater problem is
that our state schools have squandered their talents on a mass scale. The good
news is that a solution is taking root in many states.
Mr. Coulson directs the Cato Institute's Center for Educational
Freedom and is author of "Market Education: The Unknown History"
(Transaction, 1999).
A version of this article appeared July 9, 2012, on page A13 in
the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: America Has Too
Many Teachers.
