I think I posted an old letter from WDS yesterday by mistake. here's the more recent letter:
Open
Letter on Day School Tuition
|
|
As WDS begins an exciting
transition period, we wanted to take this opportunity to reaffirm our
commitment to addressing the issue of day school affordability. In February
2010, in response to a deepening economic crisis, Westchester Day School
received widespread accolades by lowering tuition for the first time in its
history. This past Fall, WDS announced another bold initiative and reduced
tuition rates in the lower grades by 25% as part of a multi-year plan
designed to reset tuition rates across ALL grades over the next seven
years. We again received praise from our community Rabbis and virtually the
entire parent body, though a small group within Westchester has chosen to
respond by opening a competing school.
|
|
Over the last four years, WDS
has found ways both to cut costs and to increase revenues. This has allowed
us to lower our tuition rates without sacrificing our superior educational
product and nurturing environment. The latest phase of our initiative, announced
this past October, reduced 2013-14 tuition rates in Ganon through 1st grade
by approximately 25%, resetting tuition for 1st grade at $13,500 from over
$18,500. The goal of our multi-year strategy is to reduce tuition
by a significant amount each year for one additional grade so that after
seven years the entire school will have a new tuition schedule. This
means that over time, a family with three children enrolled in WDS can save
over $100,000 (in today's dollars) from the new tuition schedule. In addition
to our efforts to address tuition costs, we are very proud to have
faithfully adhered to our tenet to not turn away students for financial
reasons, as we provide close to 40% of our families with financial aid.
|
|
There are two key drivers that
make this ‘reset’ sustainable. First, WDS has a debt-free balance sheet,
thanks to a history of prudent expenditures, generous community-wide
support from a very broad donor-base, and a profitable summer program.
Second, our classes are currently operating under capacity, and therefore
we can increase our class size without a commensurate increase in expenses.
With more students, we can raise revenue and thereby provide lower tuition
to our families. WDS is committed to this program, absent any extraneous
factors, but only if we meet our enrollment targets – if we meet those
targets, the program will fund itself going forward. In short, WDS has
rolled out a carefully considered, sustainable model that will provide
families with substantial tuition relief while maintaining our high quality
of education.
|
|
By all measures this initiative
should be met with excitement, energy and support. And, for the vast
majority of our community, this has been true, and we thank you for your
support. However, despite these efforts, a small group has decided to start
up a competing school and has been actively recruiting WDS families,
something never seen before in the Westchester area.
|
|
Over the past 65 years,
Westchester Day School has prepared close to 2,000 students for the high
schools and ultimately the universities of their choice, instilling them
with a love of Judaism and a strong sense of community. WDS provides a
proven academic program with a coveted accreditation by the Middle States
Association on Elementary Schools, and is situated on a spectacular
one-of-a-kind campus. Our talented faculty members, including our
specialists (phys ed, music and art teachers, a librarian and a Learning
Center team) bring a wealth of experience that cannot be replicated
overnight. We take pride in our approach to differentiated learning that
provides students with extra support or challenges, we offer stimulating
extra-curricular activities, and our children benefit from valued staff
members, including our school psychologist, nurse and social worker. Just
like any school focused on 21st century education, we have rolled out pilot
programs in blended learning, and supplemented our curriculum with
computers, SMARTboards, and even our own iPhone app.
|
|
Our pledge is to continue to
focus on containing costs, but not to the detriment of the educational,
emotional or spiritual growth of our students. We are not willing
to do away with resource rooms, over-extend class sizes, hire more
junior teachers or frequently turn over faculty in an effort to cut costs.
While we will continue to experiment through pilot programs, we are not
willing to adopt a new model until there is a curriculum (both general
studies and Judaic studies) with a proven academic track record, and one
that has demonstrated long-term financial sustainability.
|
|
Day schools around the country
have a duty to serve their communities. If a community day school chooses
to ignore the tuition issue, it ought to face pressure from its
constituency. That has never been the case with Westchester Day
School, and is certainly not the case in 2013, as evidenced by our latest
initiative. The concept of a new competitor directly undermines WDS’
multi-year strategy of lowering tuition through increased enrollment,
putting more pressure on donors in the community and jeopardizing the
prospects for tuition relief for all WDS families.
As we kick off 2013, it is an
exciting time for you to be part of the WDS family. You should take great
pride in the school and the tremendous value proposition we offer to the
community. We are once again taking a leading role in addressing day school
affordability, while at the same time we continue to introduce innovative
programming and provide a top notch education to our nearly 400 students.
We thank you for your continued
support, and look forward to celebrating with you at the upcoming Annual Dinner on
Saturday, January 12.
Dan Kosowsky
|
David Goldschmidt
|
President
|
Chairman
|
|
|
Sora · 638 weeks ago
It suprises me that they are so concerned about this 'small group' - if their program is so good and they have all these advantages - why worry about some small group of parents who are starting another school?
Firefly · 638 weeks ago
With this new price decrease they are now significantly cheaper than SAR and offer way more than a new start up school will. They seem to be banking on the fact that now WDS will be a viable option for the cost conscious families that want a full service school with a beautiful campus.
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
Sora · 638 weeks ago
Sora · 638 weeks ago
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
Let's be frank. He'Atid and others like didn't discover the computer. They are able to achieve lower prices by loading up class sizes (i.e, buying in bulk) and paying their employees nothing (sorta like asking a teacher to do the job of 5 ppl). You can call that "leveraging technology" and "empowering" the teachers but its really just a nice way of saying "buying in bulk" and paying employees far less than they deserve. Lets see how empowered, or more likely, worn out, these teachers are in a few years without any meaningful raises, because if you ask the founders of the school, real raises are not an option b/c they throw the numbers of their black box model out of whack.
Sora · 638 weeks ago
2. Listen to what the founder is saying - he isn't comparing it to Walmart. He is comparing it to the technology of what has been sold and how we can now get superior items for less. Why would i believe the rest of your argument if you start out by clearly distorting what someone says?
3. I am curious the harm of letting competition play out - Per you, WDS is a great school. Per you, WTA will just have low paid employees and overstuffed classes. Surely parents are smart enough to realize that (although many have come and toured He'atid and seen for themselves before they decided to sign up). Why does WDS care or have to set the record straight - surely the facts will speak for themselves.
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
2. I'm not distorting anything. He is analogizing his product to Wal-Mart. He then chooses to distort the analogy by trying to play up the benefits of technology while ignoring what is really going on.
3. First, I've never said WDS is a great school. I'm just commenting on the letter and its relationship to the new schools that are opening. Nevertheless, as I speculated in a prior post, maybe the letter was necessary because of the misinformation being spread around as to WDS's tuition plan. What's the harm in setting the record straight so everyone is operating with the same information?
Just saying · 638 weeks ago
You also jump on the letter from WDS with the same zeal and disbelief that you deride others for when they question He'atid's claims. With the key difference being that WDS is a real school with a long track record and He'atid and its like are experiments.
Bottom line for many of us is that He'atid is buying students by subsidizing their tuition in the hopes that they can lower costs in the future. There is little to no valid proof that He'atid's model will be as good as current schools or that it can achieve the savings it claims. Almost every parent that is sending there is doing so because of the tuition break and slick marketing to convince them that they are not going to short-change their children with an untested and lower quality education. Your continued defense of the school highlights the insecurity that the school has that people will start to realize that the emperor has no close.
Sora · 638 weeks ago
Firefly · 638 weeks ago
The kids are literally guinea pigs.
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
End Welfare - You also prove my point. I'm not worried about "average" kids. It's the kids who are vulnerable, for whatever reason, who might want to talk to Coach Dube (or whoever else) outside of the classroom, but he's not there b/c he only comes to teach gym, which by the way, makes perfect sense because that's all he's paid to do. If you want a Wal-Mart education, that's what it will look like.
thatguy · 638 weeks ago
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
Sora · 638 weeks ago
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
Sora · 638 weeks ago
Randy · 638 weeks ago
However, there is one major flaw in their thinking: the motivations for a school to improve (and by improve I specifically refer to a school (1) minimizing its tuition and (2) maximizing the quality in education) are NOT the same motivations behind businesses in a tradition industry. A school like WDS, which is the only Yeshiva in the Westchester area, is not interested in lowering tuition and maximizing the quality of its education so it can poach students from other schools. They are interested in lowering tuition and maximizing the quality of its education so it can provide the best possible education at the most reasonable price for its families. WDS’s success is not measured by the success and failures of its competitors because Yeshivas are not really competitive with one another: they all have the same goal. Therefore, a Yeshiva’s focus is not to put out the best product in comparison to other Yeshivas, but to put out the best product possible.
The problem with WTA is that it does not let WDS try and do that.
What needs to be understood is that for a school the size of WDS, (and WDS is relatively small compared to other K-8 Yeshivas) costs are not determined on a student-by-student basis. Most of their costs are fixed regardless as to how many students enroll each year. Furthermore, WDS is not interested in making a profit; their sole objective is to educate their students today and for years to come. Therefore, when WDS tries to figure out how much to charge in tuition, they are simply trying to calculate how much they can afford to charge without putting the school in financial danger. It is also significant to note that even while this is the thinking behind WDS’s tuition number, the number that is ultimately asked for does not even cover these costs. WDS is only able to stay afloat based on the many donations they receive each year.
One of the major ways WDS can lower tuition costs is by having the school operating at full capacity. Since their costs are relatively fixed, WDS only stands to benefit from every student who enrolls because it means more revenue for the school. And because WDS exists for the benefit of its families, it will use this extra revenue for the sake of its families: it will lower the costs of tuition, and will reinvest in the institution to maximize the quality of its education.
A school like WTA tries to poach students by offering a lower price for its education. It then demonizes a school like WDS by claiming it unfairly charges its “customers” and that it is ignorant of advancements in technology that can change the way schools operate. WTA has tried to frame the argument as a debate over two questions:
1. Should we be exploring how we can use advancements in technology to better our schools?
2. Is Yeshiva education too expensive?
WTA has tried to paint WDS as a school that is on the wrong end of both of these questions. In reality this could not be further from the truth. WDS believes that we should be using technology in our schools and that tuition is too expensive. WDS is not against WTA because they are against their philosophy; they are against WTA because of what WDS stands for, namely to put out the best product for its families.
When WTA takes students from WDS, WDS is no longer able to use the revenue from those students’ tuition to improve their school and to lower tuition costs. By not operating at full capacity, they cannot provide the best possible education for its families. WTA has argued that their school is validated by the fact that WDS is so threatened by them but this could not be further from the truth. Yes, WDS is threatened by WTA, but only because WDS appreciates the importance of each and every student in its school. WTA claims that it is going to change education of the future for the better while in reality all they are only ruining Yeshiva education in the present. Perhaps, they should be looking to help other schools in their mission by providing the invaluable insight they have as “technological educators.” The goal should not be to have the best school out there but the best school possible.
Buzzkill · 638 weeks ago
Firefly · 638 weeks ago
Just saying · 638 weeks ago
Avi · 638 weeks ago
It seems that Westchester is where BC was last year. The fact is that WTA is going to open the same way is as He'atid did. There will be close to 200 children attending He'atid next year - the time to debate whether it should exist or not is long past. WDS should concentrate on itself and its ability to make the education good for its students. WTA recently sent out a letter that they not only have enough students to make a Prek and K but also now to open a first. They have hired a principal and have secured a building. It seems silly to debate the merits of whether it should open or not.
Day school parent · 637 weeks ago
Firefly · 637 weeks ago
I can't think of any.......
Day school parent · 637 weeks ago
Additionally many of our shuls' Board leadership sit on legacy school Boards or are employed by these same schools.
Firefly · 637 weeks ago
I think it is naive to think that bergen county elementary schools are not lowering tuition so that pulpit rabbi's of high schools and schools in NY can have jobs. That's basically what you are saying. These rabbi's have no vested interest whatsoever.
Sora · 637 weeks ago
Day school parent · 637 weeks ago
Buzzkill · 637 weeks ago
Sora · 637 weeks ago
Day school parent · 637 weeks ago
realism · 637 weeks ago
Sora · 637 weeks ago
realism · 637 weeks ago
Sora · 637 weeks ago
realism · 637 weeks ago
Sora · 637 weeks ago
Day school parent · 637 weeks ago
grow up · 637 weeks ago
Light Of Israel · 637 weeks ago
As long as the schools will discount the price, aka scholarship, for those who can't pay the normal price, people make decisions that don't make sense. It's another reason (among several) why the scholarship system has actually decreased price pressures on existing schools. Think about it - "you can't afford it, we'll discount the price." If on the other hand, you could only spend what you could afford (which is the normal for a capitalistic system that works to lower prices), lower cost options might be more viable - more customers. Chalk it up to misguided chessed morals.
grow up · 637 weeks ago
Firefly · 637 weeks ago
You are minimally subsidizing others. Community donations are heavily subsidizing everyone. We all should be thankful to them!
grow up · 637 weeks ago
Akiva Hillel · 637 weeks ago
4 kids · 637 weeks ago
grow up · 637 weeks ago
strange · 637 weeks ago
Sora · 637 weeks ago
grow up · 637 weeks ago
strange · 637 weeks ago
sora - yes, fundraising covers most if not all scholarships. obviously depends on the school. what is clear is that heatid is using its fundraising to subsidize tuition both those who can and those who can't afford it. i'm sure this makes their parents happy and i guess aje is happy providing these funds. for me, id rather donate to help those who are real charity cases. not a middle income subsidy.