Sunday, February 10, 2013

SAR Tuition Remains Flat

SAR has finally decided to join the BC schools in freezing tuition.  This is the first time this is happening and it is happening coincidentally the same year an affordable day school is opening up in Westchester.

Glad to hear that the "progressive" tuition increase I heard about is not happening.


SAR
Dear Parents,

We are delighted to let you know that the 2013-14 Budget was approved by the Board of Trustees earlier this week.  After careful analysis and review of expected revenues and expenses, the tuition at the Academy will remain flat (0% increase) and the High School tuition will increase by $400 (a 1.3% increase).

The process of budgeting is always a challenge and we thank the Finance Committee for the substantial time and effort they put into compiling an optimal budget for our school.  The budgeting process is a balancing exercise- seeking to ensure the high quality education which SAR is known for while at the same time remaining responsive to the financial needs of our parents.

The key components of next year’s budget include:
  1. A 2% increase in staff salaries.  SAR’s mandate is to provide a high quality education in secular and Judaic studies in an environment that elicits the best from each child.  The heart of our school is our dedicated teachers who engage our students and bring the SAR education to life. 
  2. A $400,000 reduction in other expenses, including the elimination of the teacher child care program.
  3. An increase of $250,000 from annual fundraising.  With the Bendheim Challenge Grant having come to a close, we are hopeful that families who made commitments for capital will now turn their efforts to increased annual gifts to support SAR.
  4. An on-going commitment to funding the scholarship needs of our new and existing families.  For 2013-14 we have budgeted $6.1 million dollars of scholarship assistance up from approximately $3.5 million budgeted five years ago.  This level is approximately flat with last year.
We remain encouraged by the longer term outlook for increased government funding for day schools, either through tax credit or through increases in reimbursements through mandates. SAR is actively involved in leading an effort through TeachNYS to lobby for increased government funding for all private schools.  

We will continue to explore longer term opportunities for cost savings and revenue enhancements so long as they do not compromise our core values—a high quality secular and Jewish education, inclusivity of ALL children, regardless of educational or financial needs and the fair treatment of our extraordinary teachers and staff.

Wishing you a Shabbat Shalom and enjoyable February break.

Sincerely,
Jack Bendheim
Rabbi Tully Harcsztark
Rabbi Binyamin Krauss

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Kudos to SAR for upholding its standard of education, being inclusive of all children, and not cutting costs at the expense of faculty and staff. I can't say the same for any of the new schools.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
You can't say the same about the new schools bc you apparently don't know much about them. And if you read SAR's letter they are cutting staff - the day care which was utilized by teachers' children.
While I give SAR recognition for trying, this announcement is mostly being done for "optics". The flat tuition is the result of cutting a service that never should have been subsidized in the first place (day care for teachers' children) and the expectation that new fundraising will come in. On the former point, I'm surprised they are cutting it rather than just charging its true cost, but nonetheless happy to see them make a tough decision. On the latter point, they specifically state they are anticipating an additional $250K in fundraising (despite the match program ending) PLUS an increase in donations to the scholarship. Setting a budget with an expectation that more donations will come in simply shifts the "tuition" from the parents' bill to select people who make the donations to fund the gap, so no true savings there. And, there was no comment in their email if the scholarship fund will go up. Bottom line: when a school "reduces" tuition by simply assuming more donations will come in, there is no real reduction - it's just being moved to another line item and it's not sustainable.
"Setting a budget with an expectation that more donations will come in simply shifts the "tuition" from the parents' bill to select people who make the donations to fund the gap, so no true savings there. And, there was no comment in their email if the scholarship fund will go up. Bottom line: when a school "reduces" tuition by simply assuming more donations will come in, there is no real reduction - it's just being moved to another line item and it's not sustainable."

isn't this true of every school? This is how Yavneh, Noam and Moriah are funding their EC tuition reductions. They didn't miraculously become 4K cheaper, they are hoping to get donations to cover the expense ( I.e. subsidized). Same way Heatid is keeping their price as well. I wouldn't discredit SAR for still keeping the cost to parents the same.
Is it my imagination or does this blog now require one of only three, not six ways of posting comments. Why the reduction?
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
I don't know. I didn't change anything but maybe Blogger or IntenseDebate changed their interface
My question relates to the end which states, "SAR is actively involved in leading an effort through TeachNYS to lobby for increased government funding for all private schools." The OU issued a press release stating that many schools, including SAR, are partnering in their OU-TEACHNYS, lobbying effort. Are the schools being asked by the OU to pay money towards the cost of the lobbying? I have asked around, no one can give me a straight answer.
JS (hello)'s avatar

JS (hello) · 633 weeks ago

"For 2013-14 we have budgeted $6.1 million dollars of scholarship assistance up from approximately $3.5 million budgeted five years ago. This level is approximately flat with last year."

If I understand this correctly, the scholarship fund went from $3.5 million for 2008-2009 to $6.1 million for 2012-2013 (they say 2013-2014 level is essentially the same as previous). That's a HUGE increase in the scholarship fund - an increase of about 15% over each of 4 years. To me that means that the school is increasingly unaffordable to the parent base. I assume, like at other schools, the scholarship fund is mostly funded by tuition. That means the full payers are increasingly subsidizing those on scholarship.

So, I guess it's good they are keeping tuition flat, but they have a pretty serious problem on their hands long-term if they can't bring down costs.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
"To me that means that the school is increasingly unaffordable to the parent base."

Wouldn't this be kind of obvious considering the simmering recession (especially in many of the common fields of BC people) since 2007? If incomes on average are flat or lower, then affordability (by definition) goes down.
Just saying's avatar

Just saying · 633 weeks ago

JS - don't you need to know the increase in population before asserting that this is an issue. Seems like it is an issue given the way they position this point but you need to know the overall growth before determining if the school is increasingly unaffordable.
1 reply · active 633 weeks ago
JS (hello)'s avatar

JS (hello) · 633 weeks ago

The only way growth would account for the increase in the size of the scholarship fund but have no implication on decreasing affordability is if the new parents' ability to pay was in line with existing parents' ability to pay. I suppose that's possible, but the way they emphasize this point doesn't seem to bear that out. They seem to be emphasizing this point to show that they are keeping tuition flat while needing to dole out even more money to parents who cannot afford the school. In the same vein, they are keeping tuition flat while giving teachers a modest raise. In both cases the point seems to be that SAR is working hard to keep tuition flat while having certain costs rise.

Post a new comment

Comments by