Friday, April 12, 2013

Moriah Responds to Jewish Week

[Update: Julie Weiner responds: For the record, I interviewed more than one person with information about the layoffs -- not just a single disgruntled teacher. 

In addition, Moriah officials did not respond to all my questions or provide all the information I requested. When they did, I printed it, and when it conflicted with information provided by other sources, I printed and cited both. For example, I printed their enrollment numbers and their claim that the early childhood program is growing by 15 percent.]

Moriah sent out the letter below responding this Jewish Week article.  Personally I didn't think the article was so negative.  I think it framed the layoffs as an unfortunate necessity.

I'm also bothered a bit by the "quotes" of the article in the letter below.  Some of them do not appear in the article as written.  I checked in the print edition as well to make sure the web article wasn't changed in response to this letter.  If you want to summarize what was written and respond to it, fine, but don't put words in quotes when you are not accurately quoting.  For example the article didn't say "22 faculty and staff were laid off representing 20% of the total staff of 115".  It said "nearly 20 percent of the school’s roughly 115 teachers".  It also didn't say ""No severance for its staff", it said "It is not clear if all Moriah’s laid-off teachers will receive severance packages and if the packages are being determined according to a uniform system."





    

April 12, 2013
3 Iyyar 5773

Dear Parents,

We want to call your attention to  a negative article about Moriah to be published in this week's Jewish Week print edition and which is already available online.  As you are aware, tuition sustainability coupled with education excellence is very difficult to achieve. The Jewish Week chose to frame a negative article about some of the tough decisions we have had to make in order to reach sustainability. And despite providing the reporter of this story with accurate information, they chose to print inaccuracies provided by a disgruntled faculty member.

We would like to address the following: 

·       Errors in the article
·       The representation of Moriah
·       Our mission and journey

Errors in the article.  As the reporter failed to confirm the data in the article there are many errors. 

Here is a simple table regarding what the reporter states and the actual information; 

Article information
The facts
"22 faculty and staff were laid off representing 20% of the total staff of 115"
·19 faculty and staff contracts were not renewed, representing 12% of the total staff of 156.
· There are 2 new teaching positions for next year as well.
"many of them believed to be longtime employees who are in their 60s"
·  There are 5 above the age of 60
·  5 below the age of 35
·  Average age was 46
·  Average tenure was 11 years.
"Enrollment is 780 this year to about 700 projected for next year"
· Enrollment is 804 this year and forecasted to be 790 next year
· Early Childhood enrollment is up 15% for next year
"No severance for its staff"
Teachers employed by Moriah for more than 6 years will be receiving severance (1 week for each year of service) as stated in all faculty contracts.
"No raises since 2008"
Since 2008 there have been 3 raises including as recent as last year.

The representation of Moriah. Through JEFG (Jewish Education for Future Generations), the NJ area schools are working together, challenging traditional operating models toward the achievement of sustainable excellence. Moriah and its former president Sam Moed, are leading this charge along with Rabbi Goldin who co-founded and chaired JEFG. For years, Moriah has been hosting JEFG monthly meetings on our campus. The JEFG mission is to solve the tuition crisis through communal initiatives.  One such initiative was directed by Yeshiva University. The objective of the YU Benchmark process was to help the participating Jewish day schools in Bergen County and in other communities across the country, to achieve a 10% operational efficiency. Moriah, throughout this year, has embarked on a mission to achieve tuition sustainable excellence leaving no stone unturned in the process.

At Moriah we are deeply focused on making tuition affordable and sustainable for all. We have received many emails and calls from our parent body applauding the difficult decisions that were made these past few months regarding the recalibration of the Moriah operating model.  Getting Moriah's operating expenses in order is fiscally responsible (and painful). Increasing enrollment only masks the problems of tuition sustainability - it doesn't solve the problem. Besides, bigger schools should not be confused with better schools.

Our excellent and devoted faculty.  It is important to note that these are the comments of 1 disgruntled teacher.  We have 155 other faculty members who while sad to see their colleagues not return to Moriah are in fact proud to be Moriah teachers.  According to the YU benchmarks our faculty are paid more than all other schools in Bergen County.  Our tuition benefit is 20% higher than our nearest competitor.  We must ensure that the other 155 faculty members know that we appreciate their effort and commitment their passion and their patience as we quickly move Moriah to sustainable excellence. We are all a part of this incredible Moriah community.

Our community.  The depiction of Englewood as a shrinking left-wing orthodox community is highly insulting and incorrect. Members of the Englewood community were among the initial funders of Yeshivat Noam and BPY and our lay leadership are among the best and brightest, serving as thought leaders and contributors to the wider American Jewish community.  More importantly, we are excited to see new schools emerge and in their own unique way help drive educational excellence. Free markets and competition drive out cost and inefficiency while motivating toward ingenuity and an ever improving product.

Our mission and journey.  An article such as this should only serve to embolden us all. Change is difficult. Especially when it rocks the perceived establishment as incorrect and flawed as the existing foundation may be. Times have changed, these are difficult decisions and ones that were not made without deep soul searching and with a shared mission - sustainable excellence.

Thank you.

Evan Sohn, President
Jay Goldberg, Chairman
Dr. Elliot Prager, Principal 



Comments (63)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I think this is a good letter. But the part where they state that their tuition benefit is 20% higher than the next closest competitor - isn't that one of the reasons they are having financial issues?
This is an excellent letter. Not sure why Yeshiva Dad is being so critical.

I suppose that moriah could argue better staff benefits means they can attract higher caliber teachers....
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Stop the Propoganda's avatar

Stop the Propoganda · 624 weeks ago

The article was another unfortunate example of the He'Atid folks feeding misinformation to The Jewish Week as part of their slander campaign against existing schools. TJW was smart enough not to buy their propoganda on the Tiferet-HALB merger (instead characterizing it as a college kid moving back into his parent's home after failing in the real world), but took the bait this time around.
2 replies · active 624 weeks ago
Even according to their facts, why do you need 156 faculty for 804 kids? About 5 students per teacher? That strikes me as insane.
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
End,

No name calling please. But yes its ridiculous to blame He'atid parents for being the source in the article when Moriah is blaming a disgruntled teacher.
Wondering's avatar

Wondering · 624 weeks ago

Sorry Julie but isn't publishing something like "It is not clear if all Moriah’s laid-off teachers will receive severance packages and if the packages are being determined according to a uniform system" a bit prejudicial? If you don't know then you shouldn't publish conjecture just because Moriah doesn't give you that information. Would be similar to the person above who is making unfounded accusations about He'atid parents saying 'well someone told me they were feeding misinformation and no one told me they didn't'.
3 replies · active 624 weeks ago
Also Wondering's avatar

Also Wondering · 624 weeks ago

Very poor journalism on the part of TJW. This blog is filled with anti-establishment folks trying to mock the existing schools. Why doesn't it post about the fact that Tiferet failed or that WTA seems to be scaling back on its earlier plans?
Also Wondering,

We did a post about the Tiferet HALB "merger". See here: http://yeshivasanity.blogspot.com/2013/03/tiferet...

Not sure what you mean about WTA scaling back on its plans. Please explain.
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Yeshiva Dad

Julie indicated in her article that you send a child to He'atid. In your prior post you were unwilling to acknowledge if this is true or not. This would seem to put the veracity of her reporting further in question. If you were really willing to tell a reporter that you send your child to He'atid, which would clearly become public, why wouldn't you verify on your own blog?
Former Reader of TJW's avatar

Former Reader of TJW · 624 weeks ago

Julie,

As a weekly reader of TJW I used to expect its reporters to actually write News not opinions. You chose to rely on sources who claimed they havent received raises in 5 years while the letter to the parent body (also posted in this blog) last year told the opposite story. A real journalist would have either (a) discredited their sources once one of their comments is proven to be a lie or (b) asked the Moriah leadership to confirm whether faculty have in fact not received raises in 5 years. I spoke to one of the Moriah leaders yesterday and you never asked to confirm raise information, total number of faculty, etc. Shame on you for calling yourself a reporter and shame on TJW for allowing you to publish "news" that better resembles gossip.
2 replies · active 624 weeks ago
Poor journalism's avatar

Poor journalism · 624 weeks ago

I gave up on TJW long ago, as they're just a mouthpiece for the no-frills schools. people in BC bought the propaganda, but clearly Long Island and Westchester did not.
Any truth to the rumor that GD is going to start a high school?
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Teacher99's avatar

Teacher99 · 624 weeks ago

There is zero chance GD is starting any new schools. In fact, as pretty much everyone knows, Heatid is in negotiation with another well established yeshiva in order to merge. Why?

It's simple. The legacy school has the infrastructure to support more students, and heatid's model only works as long as they can shnore tons of money from the public. As neither scenario is likely, a merger makes sense. Look for heatid's tuition to come more in line with the legacy schools.

Based on heatid's parent body seeking the lowest tuition possible, I predict that if and when this happens, many heatid parents will dump their kids into shalom academy (if it ever opens!).

You heard it here first.
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Teacher99's avatar

Teacher99 · 624 weeks ago

BTW, anyone who didn't realize that YD sends his kid to heatid is delusional. YD was Chump's (the motzi shem ra of our community) hand picked successor. Anyone can see the tilt of this blog (although certainly nothing like Chump's horrible one!).

Rumor has it that when Chump finally sells his house, he'll be gone from teaneck for good.
I just went back and read the comments on the post about the merge between HALB and Tiferet. Interesting to me that there, many of the commentators congradulate the Jewish Week for exposing the truth about Tiferet and all the lies they are perpetuating about it being a merger, about HALB being interested in their model, etc. So funny how suddenly all the legacy school enthusiasts are now saying what a bad paper the Jewish Week is, how they are just a propoganda piece for the low budget schools - when suddenly a negative article about one of 'their own' is printed. The fact is, everyone knows, Moriah is in a bad place. The leaders of Moriah are to be congratulated for trying to fix the schools financial problems and bring it to a better place.
OR Teacher 99 - GD is starting a new high school and it is in the works and you dont know what you are talking about :) And there is a chance there will be a merger - but the tuition will still stay the same :) Think about your logic -one of the main points of He'atid is to provide an affordable, high quality education. To merge with another school and start charging their tuition prices - why go to the effort? Just close the school because obviously the parents will just go back ot the legacy schools they came from. And the parents -and there are quite a few - who have older kids at YNJ, Noam, etc aren't going to send to Shalom Academy or whatever charter school you maintain they want to 'dump' their kids - they want a yeshiva for their kids (btw - when there was registration for Shalom Academy two years ago -Yavneh and Moriah lost a huge number of kids -most of the kids going were from those schools - so i am not sure why you are worried about He'atid - you might want to worry about 'your own' shoudl Shalom Academy ever start up again). You heard it hear first - if there is a merger - pricing will stay the same!
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
no - when /if it would merge - the other school would be restructured to the he'atid model. that is the idea /plan - more than that - you will have to wait and find out detais should it happen :)
2 replies · active 624 weeks ago
Teacher99- You really are negative, and unfortunately lost. S.P. is right, and you would know this if you had ever stepped a foot inside He'Atid, which you clearly have not. More importantly, it's 10:33. Shouldn't you be teaching? Or are you "shnoring" off the public??
Apparently, Yavneh just sent out its letter to scholarship parents about being even tuffer about doling out scholarships. Anyone have a copy? I would love to see it/
S.P. - I would agree with you that GD is going to start a new high school. To be determined if the dynamics for high school are the same as elementary school given we have seen a number of examples of low cost high schools that couldn't get any traction and failed. You seem to have inside information about He'atid being in discussion to merge with another school. I just don't understand why He'atid would merge given this will be viewed by most people as another failure akin to Tiferet. You also seem very confident that the school they merge with will adopt their model but clearly HALB hasn't adopted Tiferet's model and it is very easy to be skeptical that they ever will. Why do you think it will be any different when He'Atid merges?
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Mark: "More importantly, it's 10:33. Shouldn't you be teaching? Or are you "shnoring" off the public?"

Actually, my teaching is free, as I volunteer. You have no clue how I make a living and I have no great desire to reveal it. Thank you for your interest in my life.

I did a very detailed study of heatid (including reading the reports they provided and speaking to trusted professionals instead of cheerleaders) when they first appeared (and when they approached me for money) and decided that it was not for my children. I know several of the parents that send there (not all, obviously) and I stand by my statements. Many of these parents would do anything to save a few bucks.. I feel so sorry that people will sell their kids for money, but I guess that's the way it is.
Teacher 99 - it is nice that you know 'several' parents who send there - what is several 3, 4? Wow that really amounts to a comprehensive study of the school and why parents send there considering there are about 118 students at the school. And surely if you looked into it and it wasn't for you - it has to be that every single other person is only sendng there because of the low tuition. Great survey taking on your part!
btw Teacher 99 -let's say that these parents decided to send there first and foremost because the education is affordable. Are you saying the education is bad? The SEVERAL parents I know who send are thrilled with the education and the teachers. So instead of going on scholarship and costing the community money, they do the responsbile thing and send their kids to He'atid and are for the most part (because really if everyone is being honest here, all the schools have issues and problems) very happy. I fail to see what the problem is here and why you keep harping that you feel sorry for people who send because of money. Who cares why they send - because what they are receiving, so far, in terms of the prek and K and 1st grade - is a good education.
2 replies · active 624 weeks ago
Teacher99- have you ever stepped a foot inside school as I asked?? And further, your information is wrong. The idea that parents at the school are only there "to save a few bucks" and have no interest in the education of their children is patently false, and frankly disgusting. I am sure you have friends who are board members and/or parents in the school. You would not have the guts to spout that nonsense to their faces. Instead, you post your bitter (why, I have no idea) rantings anonymously on this blog.
2 replies · active 624 weeks ago
oh and just to add -these prek teachers weren't fired from Lubavitch (my guess is that was coming next from you) - they left on their own and came to He'atid out of choice :)
High School Dad's avatar

High School Dad · 624 weeks ago

The excitement is building. I know for a fact that GD has a high school planned. Heard it was going to be half the price and much BETTER than the existing options.
S.P. (from an hour ago) - I would suggest it is very important for He'Atid that there program be viewed as a success regardless of whether or not they decide to go it alone. If they are unable to prove that they can provide a blended learning program that provides a high quality program at a low price then no one else will be interested in adopting this approach. Right now they have a very heavily subsidized tuition (and please don't tell me all schools fundraise, the level of fundraising per child is many times what any school would ever consider reasonable) and they haven't proven that blended learning is better or even as good as traditional methods (and please don't tell me about the "proven" examples of success elsewhere when there are less than handful of other schools that have fully implemented blended learning and none for a dual curriculum). If He'atid can't exist until 8th grade and show that it is independently providing a low cost high quality education, it will always face reasonable skepticism.
High School Dad's avatar

High School Dad · 624 weeks ago

Wondering: Your facts are wrong. They are not heavily subsidized. They in fact spent half as much as Noam spent to open and that was 12 years ago! They are also on target to break even in year 3, well ahead of when most schools do. Every school raises funds to get to breakeven. HeAtid is doing it faster and cheaper than any other school in this town. And it's coming to HS much sooner than you think!
1 reply · active 624 weeks ago
Wondering -i would say the reasonable skepticism is irrelevant - who is skeptical? You? The parents? If He'atid has close to 200 kids next year and continues to grow as it has in the past two years - what relevance does your skepticism have? If parents continue to be happy with the school - what relevance does your skepticism or 'reasonable' skepticism have?
Guest 3... no haha to you. Why don't you ask a Noam board member what condition that building was in when they moved to Paramus. He'Atid also spent a pretty penny getting that building ready for the school year. Can we try to make a rule that we will try to be factual to keep this blog respectful?? Thanks.
So funny that you all think they are merging with Yavneh or YNJ, I know for a fact that they are in negotiations with MORIAH to merge! Avi Chai has already been brought in to help with the transition.
Both YNJ and Yavneh continue to grow at a good clip and neither has room to absorb He'atid.
Wondering, you are out of the loop. Yavneh has been hurting for years!
1 reply · active 623 weeks ago
S.P., JKosh, or anyone else with "inside knowledge",

Any idea when this possible He'Atid merger would take place? Would it be for Fall 2013 or the following year?
You guys are talking out if your collective asses. None of you know anything. HeAtid is thriving. Why would they merge with anyone?
He'atid (and their sister school in Westchester) aren't likely to merge because of the egos of the leaders there. The Tiferet guy is the only one who did the rational thing and cut a face-saving deal with HALB.
You gotta love how all these shameless touters come out of the woodwork when someone dares to criticize heatid. It's quite OK for them to rip the legacy schools, but you dare not criticize the junk bond salesman who turned into an educator!
Teacher99's avatar

Teacher99 · 623 weeks ago

B G: I was wondering the same thing. Why are these people so insecure about their school? I checked out Heatid thoroughly, probably more than most of the parents who sent there. Unfortunately, I could not find a single study that showed me that blended learning is any better than traditional teaching methods for grades younger than sixth. If anyone has a study that does show this, please publish it here.

For the record, I have absolutely nothing against this school. I just think people should be honest and admit the reason they are sending their kids there is because of price. Lets face it. If heatid cost as much as the other schools, their enrollment would be severely limited.

If heatid is your solution, God bless you. I would never send my kids to an experimental program, but that's me. The important thing is that your children are getting a good Jewish and secular education. If you feel thats the case with this school, great.
So teacher 99. Lets say the school is not any better. I am happy with just as good. Any studies show it isn't ? Because my personal experience with a kid in the school is that the teachers are great and the education is great. So I save money and my kids are getting a great education. Prettysmart. Not everyone is ok with taking chances or being part of an experiment. But thank God some people are because that is what creates progress and improvement. And I am ok with criticism. Just base it on fact. Not the usual off base remarks like the school is heavily subsidized or kids spend all their time on computers or it is glorified daycare. Because those comments just demonstrate ignorance. That however much you might have read about the school you have clearly not spoken to the people involved and haven't visited. So gor instance if you criticize the school because the principal needs to improve communication ok. But not all the other junk you and others write here.
debating the absurd's avatar

debating the absurd · 623 weeks ago

Kip -- If your best argument is that a cheaper school is just as good until proven otherwise, there's really no point in debating the issue with you.
i am pretty sure that wasn't the argument. I am pretty sure that kjp was responding to teacher 99 who said there is no proof that it is better. It seems that kjp thinks the school (like many /most parents at He'atid) is really good - kjp thinks the teacher and the education is great. But debating the absurd - follow thru on your thoughts. Tell me how you know for instance BPY is a good school? They haven't had a graduating class. What proves it is a good school? Parents who are happy withe education? Teachers who are great? Kids who are learing a lot? Seems you have all that at He'atid.

Post a new comment

Comments by